Because it’s been an insanely long time since I’ve updated it, there are now twenty-five new short film reviews in the sidebar.

While I’m on the subject, I’ve had a couple of movie-related observations lately. One, the practice of using a quick cut just before an expletive in a commercial or trailer (as in “We’re gonna kick some –!” or “You low-down rotten son of –!”) is getting really annoying. I know there’s a fine line that’s being skirted here and that most trailers need to be suitable for all ages, but give it a rest already, would ya?

The other thing I’ve noticed is that when characters who are writers use in their books things that other characters have said — things that we, the audience, have heard them say earlier in the film — it’s usually just an excuse for the writer of the screenplay to trot them out again because he or she is so darn proud of them. Yes, writers do draw on real life, and sometimes they even quote it directly. I’m not denying that. I recognize that, within the story of the film, it’s usually just a quick way of showing that one character has touched another on some level. (“That thing you said to me was so life-changing I used it in a book, man!”) But the trouble is this — and it’s a trouble I’ve noticed from time to time in writing workshops — just because something happened exactly as you described it, that doesn’t mean it’s good writing. And, in a film, a lousy line of dialogue is probably going to be equally lousy or more so the second time around.

Just some thoughts.

I’ve remarked in the past that my referrer logs list the top 30 query words by the number of requests in order, and that I often think it reads like very surreal, very bad blank verse.

Sometimes, I don’t even bother noticing it, and I usually think better of actually sharing it, but today the first four words caught my eye: coitus of the chupacabra.

Throw that in your search engine and smoke it.

I know the last thing I need are more distractions, that I need to concentrate on things like writing and what I’m going to do if I can’t find a job — and that I really don’t have a lot of disposable income at the moment — but I have to say, Fable looks really cool.

Back when I was in high school, I read Anne Rice’s Interview with the Vampire. When a classmate asked me to describe it, I remember saying that, while it was a two- or three-hundred page book, it felt like it was five- or six-hundred. It wasn’t terrible, but I remember it mostly as slow and somewhat…lethargic. It was a bit of a slog.

There are those who say it’s all been downhill since then.

I don’t know. I’ve never felt any great compulsion to read the other books in her Vampire series (or any of the others), and the compulsion I had to watch the film of Queen of the Damned wasn’t exactly what I’d call rewarding. Maybe the books are okay, maybe they’re piles of dren. But, regardless, I think it’s foolhardy for Rice to start attacking readers for not liking her latest book, Blood Canticle. It’s probably even more foolhardy for her to boast that she won’t let an editor near her manuscripts — especially since, from what I’ve seen of her writing online, she’s in need of at least a proofeader.

Again, I haven’t read the other books in the series or this latest one, but Rice’s proud declaration that she feels “utter contempt” for her Amazon readers hasn’t left me too eager to continue. As Neil Gaiman points out, it’s probably best for authors to “resist the urge to put [responses like this] to paper.”