Linkpharm:


1If you really like this sort of thing, there’s also Dictionaraoke.
2I worry this is just a misprint and that it was actually a pet goat. Of course, there’s probably a George W. Bush joke in that somewhere…
3Turns out, that story might not have been true after all.

The Friday Random 10, “Third Time’s the Charm” Edition:

“Welcome Back” by John Sebastian
“Not Your Girl” by Bree Sharp
“Alleluia” by Dar Williams
“With God on Our Side” by Bob Dylan
“Driving South” by the Stone Roses
“Arco Arena” by Cake
“I Wanna Be Sedated” by the Ramones
“Real Love” by the Beatles
“I Am a Man of Constant Sorrow” by the Soggy Bottom Boys
“I’ve Got You Under My Skin” by Frank Sinatra

I don’t know…this seems pretty iffy to me. I’ve never once used, or heard anyone else use, “Netflix” as a verb. I honestly don’t think it’s entered our lexicon to that extent. The argument, on the other hand, that “Google” has entered the lexicon in this way I find more convincing.

The link, that I found through Hacking Netflix.

Also found through HN, Sarah Polley’s fascinating look back at the childhood trauma of filming The Adventures of Baron Munchausen:

I do know in retrospect that many things that terrified me were not as terrifying as they seemed then…and I’m pretty sure I know which shots were the double (specifically an overhead shot where little Kiran [stunt double Kiran Shah] is running like the graceless 35-year-old midget he was. I was pretty bitter about this loping run being attributed to me in my girly teens). However — it does raise a question of what I remember vs. what happened. It’s like this with photographs. Whole memories get built around them, which is sometimes a reflection of a general sense of things as they felt at the time, as opposed to what actually occurred.

So I’m willing to accept that my impressions may have been unlike what an adult might have. I think that’s sort of the point. It wasn’t a good environment for a kid because there were things that could easily be interpreted as dangerous without actually being dangerous. I think it’s harder to make those distinctions as a child, and I didn’t have a lot of support in trying to make them. The really traumatic things that happened are distinct memories that gave me nightmares well before the film came out, so confusion between what the stunt double was doing as opposed to me didn’t really play into my bad memories, I don’t think.

Meanwhile, at stately Wayne Manor…

“Batman” house escapes damage in Pasadena fire

Or does it? Riddle me this, Batman:

Fire Guts ‘Batman’ Mansion

Links courtesy of fellow capper PrezGAR. I’m assuming the first one was simply incorrect, but, for articles only an hour or so apart, that’s quite a discrepancy.

I’m no fire marshall or anything, but I’m going to go out on a limb and suggest there’s probably a recognizable difference between a house gutted by flames and a house completely untouched by them.

Authorities should look into whether Superman has an alibi for that evening. After all, as time and time again have shown, Superman is a dick.