I thought librarians pulling a book from the shelf because it has the word “scrotum” in it was ridiculous, but this surpasses that to an absurd and frightening level:

The office of U.S. Attorney Stephen J. Murphy has forwarded a complaint about inappropriate books assigned to Howell High School students to the FBI, a spokeswoman for Murphy said. Gina Bilaya said that while the referral is routine, it also indicates that Murphy is taking the complaint seriously.

Vicki Fyke of the Livingston Organization for Values in Education made the complaint, alleging that assignments of books by Richard Wright, Pulitzer winner Toni Morrison and Kurt Vonnegut violate laws against distribution of pornography to minors because they contain depictions of sex and rape, and obscene language. “The Freedom Writers Diary” by Erin Gruwell is also named by Fyke.

Seriously?

Link via Ed Champion. The American Family Association of Michigan — why do groups like this always have names like that? — further explains their objections to some of the books:

Please join concerned parents in urging Howell High School not to use a book (“The Bluest Eyes”) that graphically depicts the rape of an 11-year old girl by her father.

You know, it’s been awhile since I read Morrison’s novel, but I don’t remember the rape being depicted as a good thing. There’s some ugly racism in the book, too. I notice that hasn’t caught the focus of the angry Christians. The book is pretty high on the ALA 100 Most Frequently Challenged Books — and, in the 27 years since it was published, it’s been no stranger to controversy — but trying to get the FBI to classify it as child pornography seems like a new low.

This is not too far from Detroit, where I’m going to be in a couple of weeks. That scares me a little.

I usually ignore banner and pop-up ads, but I’ll admit, this one caught my eye:

Want your fifteen seconds of fame? Upload your photo wearing your Ray-Bans and we’ll plaster it on 11 screens in Time Square.

First, when did it get downgraded from fifteen minutes? Second, if you’re wearing dark sunglasses, aren’t people less likely to recognize you? And third, plenty of people see, but does anybody actually watch the screens in Times Square? Yeah, I realize this is just a stunt to encourage more people to buy sunglasses, but it seems fairly dumb.

I was searching for an image from the recent news to post today at Capper Blog when I noticed this interesting disclaimer on one of them:

EDITORIAL USE ONLY AND USAGE ONLY IN RELATION TO STORIES ABOUT POLAR BEAR PICTURED REUTERS

So no surreptitiously trying to pass this off as some other polar bear, no sir.