Neil Gaiman is right: this does seem like a particularly silly and antiquated argument:

This is not about denigrating the comic book, or graphic novel, or whatever you want to call it. This is not to say that illustrated stories don’t constitute an art form or that you can’t get tremendous satisfaction from them. This is simply to say that, as literature, the comic book does not deserve equal status with real novels, or short stories. It’s apples and oranges.

“Not to denigrate comics…but comics are stupid. What? I’m just sayin’.”

Some links:

Got a couple of spam messages in quick succession today: Walter ISBN and Dr. Baldness. That sounds like a really, really bad ’70s cop show.

And I’ve noticed that a lot of the spam I get is, in its subject line, addressed to “Barry.” My question is…why Barry specifically?