Speechifying

I finished playing Portal 2 this afternoon. On the one hand, it’s sort of great to finally be finished, but, on the other hand…dear lord, was that ridiculously entertaining. I think you need to play the first game to really appreciate the second, not just for the massive amount of story it throws at you, but simply because the first one basically teaches you the mechanics of the game. I am highly disappointed to realize I live in a world in which there is not yet (or perhaps ever?) a Portal 3.

I spent the rest of the day doing Saturday-like things. At one point, a very strong wind flung a plastic garbage can lid straight into my back. That thankfully doesn’t happen every day.

Also working on finishing the layout for Kaleidotrope #13, the last print issue, so I can then figure out the actual printing. It’s going to be a small print run, mostly just for subscribers and contributors, but there are twenty stories in this one, so it’s going to be several dozen pages no matter what I do. I think I’ve managed to bring it down to 93 pages, which is still absolutely ridiculous, but hopefully in a not entirely ridiculous sort of way.

This evening, I watched The King’s Speech. It’s quite good, and I think Colin Firth in particular probably deserved his Oscar win last year, but the best picture (and best screenplay) nods do seem a bit much. At times, it seems like a whole lot of effort — of acting, writing, direction, design, etc. — for something that’s…I hesitate to call it inconsequential. Because George VI was an important historical figure, and he came to the crown in tumultuous times. And my hat’s off to anyone who overcomes the very real difficulty of stuttering. But at the same time…the movie’s quite entertaining and well done, but it’s far from brilliant, and this was far from the most important moment in history, or even perhaps the most important aspect of this particular moment.

Sun day

Less than a week ago, we turned on the heat. Today, I had the air conditioning back on. The weather has been weird, to say the least. Remember when we had those things called seasons? Fall and spring particularly seem like fond and distant memories.

Anyway, beyond spending a lot of the day watching Breaking Bad episodes and thoroughly failing at the Sunday crossword (so far), I spent a little time tidying up the layout and making corrections to the next issue of Kaleidotrope. I think, despite my best efforts at avoiding this, it’s going to be a Very Big Issue Indeed, maybe even 100 pages. That gets a little difficult when you start folding and stapling paper — at the zine’s trim size, 100 pages translates into 25 sheets, plus a card stock cover — but I don’t see how I can avoid it. And really, it’s the last print issue for the foreseeable future, as I make the uncertain transition into online zine, so is it such a terrible thing? Lots of interesting stories this final (printed) go-around.

I also wrote this odd thing:

This is the story of how Coyote tricked the world into never ending.

Once there was a time machine. The elders say that like it ought to mean something, and I guess maybe once it did, when there used to be things like machines, things like time. When there was some kind of real division between what is now and what was then. This machine opened doorways, but not just from one room to another like we see every day, doorways between the crowding dark outside and what life we have in here around the flame. These were doorways in the fabric of reality. That fabric’s grown tattered over the years since then, frayed so much along the edges that we don’t even realize, wouldn’t realize even if we knew how to look, those of us who came after it. These were doorways swung wide between what the elders call “the past” and what we, thanks to Coyote, know only as the now.

I’d like to say I’m getting ahead of myself, which is something that Chief Little Owl likes to say, when it’s him telling this story. But you and I, we know that isn’t possible. We both know we won’t remember this when the story’s done, not the way Little Owl and the others say they remember things, remember a world before the time machine, before the end of time itself. Before this living hell.

But is it hell? If you were born in hell, had known nothing else your entire life, would you know? Would you care? The elders tell us we should care, that time as we who were born after know it is deeply flawed, cracked and broken in Coyote’s fun. The world may never end, but neither will it ever begin. Nothing will ever… They have a word for it, one they say with hushed tones of awe like it means more than it seems, more than those few letters could ever mean.

The elders have a word for this thing that never happens anymore, and they call it change.

But once, they say, there was a time machine, built by a man who imagined himself a god, but whose plans Coyote thought to reveal as demonic. Coyote, the trickster, looked down on this man from the heavens, the black void that used to only be above, not all around, us, and then only in the depths of night. And Coyote grinned, for here was his chance to remake — or maybe unmake — the world.

It’s difficult to tell a story in a world with broken time. We have only the faulty and fading memories of the few who lived in a world before then. To even understand phrases like “before then” we need their guidance. We live in a world as constant as theirs was changing, and we maybe don’t have enough common vocabulary to bridge the gap.

So. Once, when there was a “once,” there was a time machine. It was made to see the world, or perhaps to free the world. What does it matter now? If stories are designed to teach us moral lessons and prevent us from repeating the mistakes of the past, do they have any use beyond a passing distraction in a world where those lessons can never be applied, where those mistakes can never be made anew? Once there was a time machine. Coyote stole it. And with it, he broke time.

The man who invented it, Chief Little Owl calls Smith, which sounds like a strange name in an already strange story. He worked for a man named Jones, but secretly wanted the time machine for his own. Coyote came to make an offer; he told Smith he could take the machine so far into the future that no one, not even Jones, would ever find him. And because Smith wanted the machine, because there was greed in his heart, which had turned twisted and ugly before Coyote even turned his attention to this game — because of this Smith believed Coyote, the trickster who walked amongst us once, and who now is all there is in the great dark that presses in from outside.

I never claimed this story would make any sense.

I’m really not sure what’s going on there. The Native American elements, inspired very directly by a writing prompt, feel like half-remembered window dressing. I took an English class my senior year that was, in part, about the trickster myths, and I find it interesting, but it’s not a tradition I’m heavily steeped in. (Nor would I necessarily recommend anyone reading that term paper I linked to above. I certainly haven’t read it in over ten years.) But, these Sundays are free-writing sessions, forty minutes of putting words to paper (or iPad) without really caring if they’re good or not.

I don’t know if that’s easier or harder since the three-day novel. I definitely had plenty of experience then getting words down without worrying if they were any good or not. (And knowing they probably weren’t but still going forward.)

Anyway, that was Sunday. I didn’t play a single level of Portal 2…though really only because I’m having an issue with my log-in credentials and need Steam/Valve to re-set them. (I love the games, and think I get why they’re on Steam instead of wholly downloaded to my computer, but it does make for some annoying moments like this.)

Yep, that was Sunday.

If the world ended on a Monday, would anybody notice?

I wish I’d worn a jacket today.

It got cooler unexpectedly — although unexpected only if you discount the fact it probably ought to have been cooler a whole lot sooner, that days with highs of 80 degrees (something like 25 Celsius?) maybe aren’t the norm for late September or early October. But just a week ago, I was wearing short-sleeved shirts to work, and I didn’t think I needed more than the long-sleeved shirt (plus T-shirt beneath) I decided to wear today. It was a little cool, but I figured once the sun came up, I’d be fine.

And I was, but I kind of wish I’d worn a jacket. The sun didn’t come up all that much.

Metaphorically, though, it came up pretty nicely.

Oh, sure, there was that police shooting around the corner from my office. I mean literally around the corner. It happened last night apparently, and today it was just a crime scene investigation that had the block cordoned off and blocked to traffic. But still: yikes.

Otherwise, though, things were good, even for a Monday. I discovered first thing that Kaleidotrope had again been reviewed in Locus. The review, of the past two issues, is kind a mixed bag — Rich Horton singles out a couple of stories for praise, but he’s not uncritical of them — but it was still great to see the zine reviewed in those pages. (Even if the physical pages proved exceptionally difficult to track down. I eventually purchased the PDF direct from Locus, decided to re-up my lapse subscription in the process.)

Then this evening, after work, I attended a short panel discussion ostensibly on Utopia/Dystopia at the Center for Fiction. It was the start of a month-long series on fantasy and science fiction at the Center, most of which I’m actually (right now) planning on attending, and it was interesting, if not exactly what was advertised. Though authors Anna North, Kathleen Ann Goonan, and Charles Yu seemed to be, occasionally, trying to steer the conversation back towards all things utopian and dystopian, I’m not sure moderator DongWon Song was on the same page as everyone else. The discussion, for the most part, was a lot broader, about being a science fiction writer and the differences (real and market-imposed) between it and “mainstream” or “literary” fiction.

As such, it was interesting, but nothing especially new. The debate over where genre begins and ends, the benefits and drawbacks to writing within it, has been raging for years.

Still, it was interesting. Charles Yu’s How to Live Safely in a Science Fictional Universe was one of the best books I read last year, and I enjoyed Goonan’s Queen City Jazz well enough years ago. (I thoroughly gave up on the first of the sequels just this year, however, and I felt a little guilty about that sitting there. I may feel guiltier on Wednesday, when the panel on fantasy includes Lev Grossman.) I’d never heard of North before, though I thought she spoke quite knowledgeably about science fiction, and she seemed the most determined to (subtly but repeatedly) steer the conversation back towards the end of the world.

No small surprise since that’s kind of what her book is about.

Still, these seemed like good people to be talking about utopia and dystopia and the contrast between the two. That what they mostly discussed seemed closer in spirit to the topic of Margaret Atwood’s upcoming talk — one of the few Center events this month I think I won’t be attending — was amusing, especially since it was only back in March that I went to hear Atwood herself speak about utopias and dystopias. (She favors the term of her own coinage, ustopias.)

Noonan defended her most recent novel, which apparently posits an alternate history, as not a utopia, as if that in and of itself was a dirty word. Changing some things just creates new problems, she said — I think rightly — which led later into a discussion of whether utopias are even possible. The odds of something terrible happening, even if it’s not specifically another ice age (North) or nanotech gone wild (Goonan) or “time travel as a means of regret” (Yu), are a lot better than a perfect world. The real world, after all, isn’t perfect, and it’s full of fallible people.

In many stories, in fact, dystopias are the price the characters (and/or world) pay for the creation (or failed creation) of someone else’s utopia. Perhaps every dystopia is simply a failed utopia, or the nostalgia for a lost one. Specific examples cited by the authors (and by the one audience member who really asked a question about the topic) included Ursula K. Le Guin’s “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas,” Sheri S. Tepper’s The Gate to Women’s Country, H.G. Wells’ The Time Machine, Atwood’s own The Handmaid’s Tale. These are often utopias at first glance — Wells’ Eloi, for instance, who live a life of comfort and ease — with a dystopia lurking beneath — the Morlocks, literally beneath, toiling in slavery underground. Or they are stark dystopias — Atwood’s repressive Republic of Gilead — brought about when someone — in this case the leaders of Gilead — attempt to impose their brand of utopia on the world. As North pointed out, the villains in dystopias tend to think they’re creating utopias, much like supervillains in comics.

“There’s always a mad scientist,” added Goonan.

Yu’s book, by contrast, is more a “personal dystopia,” or rather “not a dystopia, but just a super-sad universe.” Still, he talked about being liberated in his writing when he actually created that universe, gave it structure, form, and rules. “I was bound by my own constraints,” he said, and that’s what was so freeing as a writer.

So, in all, it was an interesting evening, if not exactly what I’d been led to expect. I didn’t stay for the book signing or wine reception afterward, but I’m glad I went all the same.

Even if, on the walk back to my subway, I kind of wish I’d worn a jacket.

Satursomeday

I spent the day mostly doing what I planned on doing yesterday: working on the layout of Kaleidotrope‘s next issue, the last one that’s likely to need this particular type of layout. I started, way back in 2006, creating issues entirely in Microsoft Word, but at least half of them have since been built in Microsoft Publisher. It doesn’t have all the bells and whistles of a Quark or PageMaker, but it also didn’t come with their hefty price tags. I didn’t finish, and I’m still waiting on a couple of stories, but I’m keeping my fingers crossed that I can have copies in the mail and to reviewers before the month’s end.

Maybe by then the weather will actually start seeming like October.

Otherwise… I mowed the front and back lawn, hopefully for the last time this season. (Fall’s gotta start sometime right?) I bought some overpriced caramel corn outside the post office to support the local Cub Scouts. I got a shirt back from the cleaners completely ripped down the back, with the not at all satisfactory explanation that “it must have come to them like that.” (They didn’t charge me, but the shirt’s ruined, thrown in the garbage.) And I watched The 39 Steps, a thoroughly enjoyable Hitchcock thriller.

A quiet not especially eventful Saturday — the shirt and lawn notwithstanding — but a decent one.

Friday!

No horrible commuting stories today, thank heavens. Even the connecting train in Jamaica this morning that I thought would be canceled — mainly because the LIRR website told it had been canceled — arrived pretty much on time. Today wasn’t much better or worse than any other Friday.

I hope to spend the weekend working on Kaleidotrope. With just a couple of exceptions, where I’m waiting on authors, everything is edited, and layout just needs to be finalized. I’m looking forward to getting this done…so I can pretty much immediately move into getting January’s issue ready. I suspect 2012, when I go wholly digital — and free, for those of you either with no cash to spend on a subscription or even just a bit of schadenfreude for my soon-to-be-emptying pockets — will be something of a learning process.

I won’t miss collating and mailing, though, that’s for sure.

I might also watch a movie over the weekend. It’s been a while since I did that.