Monday various

Movie signs

I recently — last Saturday and tonight, to be more precise — watched a couple of movies: Timecrimes (aka Los cronocrímenes) and The Man from Earth (aka Jerome Bixby’s The Man from Earth).

Both were solidly entertaining, Timecrimes for the enjoyable time travel puzzle it creates, and Man for the intriguing ideas it raises. In fact, it’s essentially nothing but ideas: 90 minutes of very good actors just talking to one another. Man has the feel of an old-school Twilight Zone or Star Trek episode — no wonder, given its late author’s background, and the fact that it was first conceived in the 1960s. But that’s not to say it feels padded out to feature length. I think it’s exactly the right length.

Timecrimes was a solid B, B-minus, and I think I liked it better before it was clearly a time travel movie. In its opening scenes, when you don’t quite know what’s going on, it’s actually quite atmospheric and scary. But it’s entertaining beyond that, if never entirely surprising or scary afterward.

(I did like how binoculars and rear-view mirrors were used — maybe intentionally, maybe not. I don’t think this qualifies as a spoiler. In theory, we use these things to see further, to magnify, but they cut off our peripheral vision, the binoculars especially. Anything that fall out of frame can sneak up on us. And in a movie like this, they often will.)

I’d recommend both movies. Both short and entertaining, interesting in their own ways.

Other than that, I’ve mainly been watching some television, including old-school Doctor Who. Having finished Peter Davison’s run on the show (well, aside from Snakedance, which I had trouble finding until recently), I’ve decided to risk Colin Baker’s interpretation. I’m worried, though, that Betty may be right about the character, certainly in her problems with his first episode. Still, it would be hard to disappoint after The Caves of Androzani, Davison’s last. Aside from the always low production values — and a completely superfluous man-in-rubber-suit monster — that was some really excellent work.

Random 10 5/8

Last week’s answers. This week’s mysteries:

  1. “Frozen” by Tegan and Sara
    There’s not much said that I don’t know
  2. “Polyester Bride” by Liz Phair
    You’re lucky to even know me
  3. “All Night” by Sam Phillips
    I could fly if I could only fall
  4. “Gump” by Weird Al Yankovic, guessed by Victor
    Waitin’ for the bus with his hands in his pockets
  5. “Feels Like Home” by Bonnie Raitt
    Something in your eyes, makes me want to lose myself
  6. “Red Right Hand” by Nick Cave & the Bad Seeds, guessed by Betty
    They’re whispering his name through this disappearing land
  7. “Milk” by Garbage
    I am red hot kitchen
  8. “Honky Tonkin'” by Hank Williams
    If you go to the city then you will find me there
  9. “Vincent O’Brien” by M. Ward
    There may even be a man in the moon
  10. “Sept 15 1983” by the Mountain Goats
    Where will the wicked run to on that last day?

Can you guess what songs these are? Good luck!

Hungry like the Wolfe

I finished reading Gene Wolfe’s Urth of the New Sun this evening, and you know, it really does shed a lot of new light on the four books before it. Here are a couple of things John Clute had to say about Gene Wolfe, in discussing his recent Best of short story collection:

We do not enter a story by Gene Wolfe without knocking, because the door to the inner rooms is never open. What many potential readers have wrongly assumed over the years, however, is that a door that is not open is door that is locked, that everything Wolfe writes needs a key—probably inscribed with runes—to get inside of.

…and…

What is pointed at is each word. The only way to read Gene Wolfe is to knock first, to glue your eyes to the carapace and peer into the world inside, like a blind man suddenly gifted with sight. The only way to read Gene Wolfe is to read Gene Wolfe.

Ain’t that the truth. I’m also reminded of something user timbot recently wrote at the Gene Wolfe Solar Cycle Book Club:

On an aside, do you ever find with Wolfe that you have a clear memory of the text only to go off and find the relevant passage to find that there is a clause or modifier in it that you didn’t remember, making the whole quote (the cornerstone of some argument you were constructing of course) less concrete than you had previously thought? Genius!

Wolfe really does ask a lot from his readers.