It’s all a bit mental

So I was watching this week’s episode of The Mentalist, and a couple of things about it bugged me. Overall, I really enjoy the show (and this episode), which I think coasts by on some clever writing, hints of darkness, and Simon Baker’s not inconsiderable charm. But the show isn’t perfect, and this week’s episode was no exception. Some spoilers follow.

First, there was the Taser scene. Agents Lisbon and Rigsby are trying to take a suspect in for questioning. The suspect gets angry, pushes Rigsby away, then moves threateningly towards Lisbon. And then she, very calmly and with a smile on her face, Tasers him. Leaving aside the potentially ugly subtext of this being an angry black man going after a white woman — which I suspect was unintentional — I was a little disturbed to see a Taser depicted as the acceptable, immediate go-to for law enforcement. (That’s what it’s increasingly become, but there’s plenty of evidence that that’s not a good thing.) It was a quick scene, played mostly for laughs — but I think that’s maybe what bothered me most about it.

Then there’s the fact — and this is the much bigger spoiler — that the episode is all about revisiting the sins of Patrick Jane’s past and the consequences of the lies he told as a “spiritual medium.” Except it turns out that this one wasn’t a lie. He told a woman that her husband was cheating on her. She divorced her husband, and now he and their son blame Jane for the whole thing. But the husband was cheating on her. Jane may have been lying about how he knew this — more direct observation, less spiritual connection — but I would have liked it more if he’d told her what she wanted to hear, ruined a man’s life, and then been wrong. This way offered too quick a redemption — See? He cheated some people, but he probably helped this woman. Heck, she even went on to happily re-marry. The show has demonstrated it’s willing to take Jane into some dark emotional places; I wish they hadn’t pulled their punches like this.

Oh, and while I’m speaking of spiritual mediums, it turns out that my former Jujitsu instructor is one. I don’t know exactly how — if at all — to feel about this, largely because it’s been close to twenty years since I was a student with him. But I find the whole medium thing rather morally dubious. I suppose there’s something to be said for providing comfort to grieving family and friends, but that comfort comes with a pretty high price, as well as claims to psychic abilities I’m fairly certain I don’t believe in.

Library things

Kevin Myers at The Independent wonders, “If we have free books, why not free concerts or free theatre?” (Link via SF Signal.)

Except, y’know, we do have those things. I don’t know how much of these arts are subsidized by the government and taxpayers in the UK, but these are not crazy socialist concepts.

Myers goes on to write:

Now, only a baboon would deny the usefulness of free libraries to children. But why should any well-paid person like myself have their literary tastes paid for, including author royalties, by the taxpayer? Meanwhile, the bookshop down the road has to match the range of taxpayer-funded facilities being provided free of charge at the library, and make a profit, a concept about as foreign to a state-run lending library as toilet paper is to a fish.

I don’t know where to start with this. Maybe with the fact that not every tax-payer is well-paid, or at least can’t afford the discretionary funds that are needed for buying lots of books? That libraries tend to encourage book sales rather than the opposite by allowing readers to discover new authors? That you’d be hard-pressed to find a publisher, much less an author, who doesn’t support and often make use of libraries? Or that hey, your taxes go to pay for a lot of things you may never directly use but that other citizens use quite a lot. That’s sort of how taxes (and a society) work.

Are we really at the point where we’re arguing not just for less spending on arts but on scrapping the whole concept of public libraries?

Random 10 3/20

Last week. This week:

  1. “Orange Blossom Special” by Johnny Cash
    Ain’t you worried about getting your nourishment in New York?
  2. “Ocean of Noise” by Arcade Fire
    Now who here among us still believes in choice?
  3. “Boulevard of Broken Dreams” by Green Day, guessed by Eric B.
    Sometimes I wish someone out there would find me
  4. “I Was Made for You” by She & Him, guessed by Eric B.
    I was takin’ a walk when I saw you pass by
  5. “Long Tall Sally” by Little Richard, guessed by Eric B.
    He saw Aunt Mary comin’ and he ducked back in the alley
  6. “Cuz I’m Here” by Ruthie Foster
    Take everything that you gave when things were nice
  7. “America Is” by Violent Femmes, guessed by Kim
    It’s a big surprise right between the eyes
  8. “Runaway” by Del Shannon, guessed by Eric B.
    Tears are fallin’ and I feel the pain
  9. “Battle for Britain (the Letter)” by David Bowie
    But I’d rather be a beggar man on the shelf
  10. “Lies” by the Pierces
    Aren’t you ready to come clean?

Good luck!

Wednesday various

  • Scales on bus stop benches to shame people into going to the gym? It sounds like an interesting idea — how much do these thing cost, and easily damaged are they in public places? — but also like a terrible marketing idea. [via]
  • Old age begins at 27? I wish I could say I didn’t believe it. Maybe going to the gym isn’t such a bad idea after all. [via]
  • Missing Doctor Who tapes in Zimbabwe? Time to step up the diplomacy, United Kingdom! [via]
  • Is Diebold even pretending they’re not trying to rig an election anymore? [via]
  • If Fox thinks removing extras from DVDs is going to encourage me to buy instead of rent, they’re sadly mistaken.

The superhuman crew

There’s a really terrific (but hugely spoiler-filled) critique of Watchmen — more graphic novel than movie — over at Comic Book Resources with Damon Lindelof, Carr D’Angelo and Atom! Freeman. I think my favorite part — which, again, is a huge spoiler — is the following exchange:

DAMON: I want to talk about Rorschach. Question…

CARR: He is the Question.

DAMON: Rorshach’s face is his everything. In fact, he’s literally holding it on as he’s fighting Adrian in the previous issue. And yet… once he realizes Jon is going to vaporize him, what does he do? He takes off his mask. And so, the question is this: does Jon kill Rorschach? Or does Jon kill Walter?

ATOM!: Wow. Who knew there were still surprises? Walter kills Rorschach. Jon kills Walter.

CARR: Removing the mask is a symbolic suicide. But it’s also saying that you can kill the person who is Rorschach, but not the idea of Rorschach.

DAMON: Well, Rorshach makes such a big deal out of that mask and what it means in regards to his identity.

CARR: Rorschach lives on in the journal too. “Nothing ever ends.”

DAMON: I’ve always felt that Moore’s decision to kill Rorschach was the only way to guarantee no one would ever write a sequel.

CARR: There was talk of a Nite Owl/Rorschach prequel and a Minutemen series.

DAMON: Thank God it was just talk.

CARR: Moore, ironically, thought the book would go out of print

ATOM!: Strange to think that this wasn’t designed to be read and re-read.

DAMON: I’ve always wondered about Rorschach’s decision.

CARR: Well, he wasn’t going to get very far on foot was he?

DAMON: Clearly, the difference between right and wrong seems very clear to him. But I’ve always wondered what he thought it would accomplish if he did expose the truth. I think Rorschach doesn’t want there to be peace, because he doesn’t understand it. And there’s no place for him in a world where there aren’t animals to put down.

ATOM!: I think the mistake is to think Rorschach thought through longterm. Veidt thought longterm and decided to grow a giant squid. Rorschach knocked heads together until he got an answer to his question.

CARR: But is a world without nuclear war necessarily a peaceful one?

DAMON: Well, that’s the $64,000 question. Did it work?

ATOM!: Wait for the sequel.