GersonK suggested this cap I made Saturday night might have t-shirt potential:
“Yes we Vulcan.”
What do you think?
"Puppet wrangler? There weren't any puppets in this movie!" – Crow T. Robot
The result suggests the Cliffs Notes’ version of a book that wasn’t worth reading in the first place.
He also writes:
Getting Reeve, Kidder, and Hackman to reprise their roles lends the film an air of authenticity but The Quest For Peace still feels like one of those creepy DirecTV commercials that drop clumsy commercial plugs into classic movies. It looks real but it still feels disturbingly ersatz.
I can remember seeing this in theaters. My ten-year-old self didn’t hate it, but probably should have. I’ve had no desire to ever re-visit it, whereas the suckiness of Superman III still has its limited charms.
Still, it wasn’t all bad. As Rabin points out, Reeve only agreed to participate if the studio also bankrolled his pet project, Street Smart, which is the film that introduced the public to Morgan Freeman — and for which Freeman earned his first Oscar nomination.
Originally Salvation Army officers (full-time ordained ministers) were required to marry other officers if they wished to remain in the ministry. But this is now changing, and it will be more possible in the future to find an officer who is married to a non-officer. However, Salvation Army officers still usually marry other officers by choice. This creates a special partnership in ministry, and in local centres in particular this joint ministry can make the work more effective.
So maybe someone at the Oshkosh branch didn’t get the new memo?
Obviously, some of this is for dramatic purposes — would it be at all scary to watch zombies fight amongst themselves? — and it probably requires another viewing of the films in question.
I’m still enjoying Top Chef, by the way, although I think overall I enjoyed last season more. That’s partly because of the contestants, but also partly because of some of the weird challenges and kinks in the format they’ve introduced this time around. Two contestants sent home the first day? A Thanksgiving episode, when the show was filmed over the summer? Still, I find it hard not to get caught up in it week to week. I studiously avoid reality television, but this is the one exception.
I wasn’t in love with the book, I must admit, when I read it a few months ago. It felt a little like Ellis warmed over at times. Already, vast swaths of the plot and characters are forgotten — poof! — from my brain.
For all the talk of our superficial obsession with beauty, it looks like underneath it all we know that brains contribute to sex appeal too.
This seems like old news to me — although outside of a classroom, I don’t think I’ve ever lied about reading something. (And even then, I never felt good about it.) I was reminded of this 2001 Slate article, discussing the classics that academics often skip:
In his novel Changing Places, David Lodge describes a literary parlor game called “Humiliations” in which participants confess, one by one, titles of books they’ve never read. The genius of the game is that each player gains a point for each fellow player who’s read the book—in other words, the more accomplished the reader, the lower his or her score. Lodge’s winner is an American professor who, in a rousing display of one-downmanship, finally announces that he’s never read Hamlet.
I’m mildly embarrassed by some of the books I haven’t read — I have read Hamlet — but I like to think I’m above lying about it, even to impress women.