This morning, at around 2:30, the fire alarm in the hallway outside my front door went off. So I stumbled from bed, pulled on a pair of jeans, my jacket, and sneakers, and I wandered outside to see what was up. Apparently so had my neighbors, and the fire trucks flashing their red lights in our parking lot pretty much confirmed that this wasn’t just a glitch within the alarm system. No, apparently someone on the second floor had decided to cook something and had then gone to sleep with the oven still on. I saw no hooks or ladders or hoses, though, so there couldn’t have been much of a fire. We were let back inside within about twenty minutes. As I stumbled back into bed, I found myself thinking, “well, at least it’s something to write about on my weblog.”

I was going to post this as a reponse to the comments made here, but apparently there’s a 2500 character limit to comments and no way to change that. So, just in case you’re wondering what the hell I’m talking about, or who I’m talking to, that’s where you want to look.

Nyssa: I’m not too worried about perceived indiscretions. I don’t interact much with students through work, and most of those with whom I do interact are grad students. And a number of them spend most every waking moment squirreled away in the lab. If I’m not mistaken, none of the members of the Python Society are in the department where I work, and I’m not in a position of any real authority where it might become an issue, even if they were. I don’t think you should necessarily worry. If you find a club on campus that you like, I think you should enjoy yourself. Someone could just as easily try to make Eric suffer because you refused to lend him/her a pencil in class, or because of something equally ridiculous. College should be fun for adult students, too.

As for the hug, de nada. I’m just glad it helped.

John: There was a campus improv group briefly, but it seems to have folded about as quickly as it started. I knew the president and founder — he’s actually the one who first took over for me as Python Society president when I graduated — but I never attended a meeting. His idea of a good improv game was a little different than mine and seems to have grown out of live action roleplaying more than anything else. I tried to get into LARPs, briefly, but the game I was in fell apart, and the people who’d convinced me to go in the first place moved away, so my interest sort of waned. The opportunity to play again never really arose, and, quite frankly, some of those people scare me.

We started doing comedic improv with the Python Society while I was still president, and, although some people seemed to enjoy it, I’m not sure I’d characterize it as a smashing success. When we started to rehearse for our first live show a couple of years later, we decided to break the evening up with games like “Questions Only” and “World’s Worst” and “Helping Hands“. That way, if nothing else, there were fewer lines to memorize. And it was great fun within the group, but in front of an audience it was a little more difficult. We froze up or relied on the worst suggestions from the crowd, and we’ve been a little hesitant about trying it again. We did co-sponsor a night of improv on campus last fall, but the late time and the location didn’t work to our advantage. We ended up doing a lot of the improvising ourselves, rather than getting audience members involved, and the results weren’t always spectacular.

But I still miss it. I miss the improv we did at meetings more than anything else. I miss thinking on my feet, the challenge of making something like “Two-Line Vocabulary” funny, and the energy that comes from thinking you’re going to fall flat on your face and instead making somebody laugh. The problem with getting a new group together is a) I’m much more comfortable with people I already know, and b) I don’t know anybody else. Right now, all my local friends are within the club, and I’m not entirely sure where to go looking outside of it.

Which is, of course, part of the problem. I wouldn’t be so worried about becoming irrelevant if I had other areas on which to focus my attention.

Sharon: Thank you. Although you did make me suffer somewhat for those crinkly-paper newsletters that first meeting, I have always been glad you decided to attend. I sometimes find it difficult to remember that there was a time when I didn’t know you. You’re still relevant to me, too. I don’t, for instance, read your weblog just because you read mine. I read it because I think you’re an interesting person, and I want to know what you have to say.

And I agree with you, to some extent, about Penn State. I like this town, but I sometimes worry that what I like most about it is its familiarity. A few undergraduate students have called me sir, and I think one visiting scholar actually called me Professor a month ago, but it isn’t the perceived aged difference that really bothers me. Like you said, it’s trying to hold onto something and instead being reminded that you’re no longer a part of it really. That feeling has become a little more pronounced this year. Maybe it’s because I don’t yet know any of these new members, or because I’m throwing too much of my energy into one area, but I don’t know.

I have to wonder: if the club isn’t keeping me here, what is?

And as far as lethe dreams is concerned, I will try to e-mail you, but the problem is, if I had a succinct definition of what I wanted, I suspect I would have managed to cobble something together already. I think what it needs is a clear vision, or at least a vision clearer than “hey, wouldn’t it be cool to start a lit-zine?” I’ve never even been completely comfortable with the title, if only because I don’t think most people know how to pronounce “lethe”. I will mull it over and let you know; traffic and submissions would most definitely be appreciated.

Last night, I watched a few minutes of a program that featured an Unsolved Mysteries-type crime scene dramatization. The police were showing photographs of their suspect to a clerk in a hardware store, trying to determine what the suspect had purchased earlier that day. I thought the photograph looked a little strange, a little too glossy, a little too professional. Not at all like a borrowed family photo or a police mug shot. And then I realized: it was the head shot of the actor playing the suspect, the one he probably sent the casting director that landed him the part.

I don’t know, I just found that amusing. I was reminded of stories of America’s Most Wanted actors being mistaken for the criminals they were hired to portray.

A couple of interesting bits from this week’s issue of The Onion. From an interview with author Chuck Palahniuk:

And I thought, “What if there was something from a previous culture that was innately powerful, and then people picked it up to make a buck from it and ended up disseminating some really dangerous piece of information?” Like nuclear waste. What’s to say that, in God knows how many years, some culture isn’t going to pick up our nuclear waste and start making jewelry out of it? There’s this big government project in Nevada, for artists to create a sculpture that will be frightening enough to keep people away from the nuclear-waste dump for the next 10,000 years. Supposedly, there’s never been a form of semantics, a language, that has existed that long. They’re trying to find something that will function as language beyond our civilization, that will keep people away from there forever and ever. I just think that’s a glorious idea.

From a review of the new Harry Potter movie:

Like its predecessor, Harry Potter And The Sorcerer’s Stone, Harry Potter And The Chamber Of Secrets works perfectly well as a cinematic corollary to J.K. Rowling’s adored children’s fantasy series….But try imagining a universe in which the Harry Potter series existed only in film form. Would audiences still find themselves transported by such thinly drawn characters? Would the imaginations still leap for the nonstop assault of impressively realized but creatively pedestrian special effects? And would the two-and-a-half-hours-plus trek toward an unmasking straight out of Scooby Doo seem quite so satisfying?”

I haven’t seen either movie (or read the second book), but from what I’ve heard, I’d have to say most likely no. The films have been called entertaining, but they certainly haven’t been championed as wondrous or magical in the same way that Rowling’s books were. As Keith Phipps’ review points out, “So far, the series has relied on viewers’ familiarity with Rowling’s characters to fill in blanks that other movies would have to fill for themselves.”