Giant inflatable beavers?

Not a whole lot to say about today, actually. It was the tail end of my unexpected three-day weekend, and I spent it mostly doing the same things I did for the past two days. I did finish a short-short story I’ve been working on recently, and I e-mailed it out to a small-press magazine for consideration. So, y’know, fingers crossed and all that. Regardless of what happens to the story, it’s nice to finish a piece and send it out. That’s not something I do often enough.

I spent the rest of the day reading through accumulated links in Google Reader and watching some stuff online and on DVD. There are scant few extras on the DVD for A Serious Man, but I was amused when one of the production crew discussed how, in re-creating the ’60s, they couldn’t use cars made later than 1960, since these look too distinctively flashy, too later-century, to our modern eyes and therefore don’t read as believable on the screen anymore. I remember this sort of thing coming up a few years back in my viewing of Lost and Deadwood, and how those shows had to diverge from reality in order to make things look more real.

What I didn’t watch today was the winter Olympics — though from all the talk on Twitter, I gather I missed one heck of a hockey game between Canada and the United States and I am, right now, missing one very interesting closing ceremony. I watched a lot more of this year’s Olympic games than I have in recent years, and from the little I saw I think Vancouver did a splendid job of hosting the events. It was nice to regain a little of the Olympic spirit I really haven’t felt too strongly since the early ’90s, but I’m afraid that didn’t translate to watching a parade of flags and Nickelback. Not when there were episodes of The Mighty Boosh and Being Human I could watch.

Though if someone had told me there would be giant inflatable beavers, I might have reconsidered.

2 thoughts on “Giant inflatable beavers?

  1. Well done! You must resist the Nickelback at all costs. We have no choice in Canada, our radio stations are legally obligated to play 65% Canadian music. This explains why bands like Nickelback are famous here. You can avoid our fate!

  2. Are they legally required to have half the music in French?

    I’ll admit, when I first read, on Twitter, that Nickelback was a central act in the closing ceremonies, I thought everyone meant Nickel Creek. And the idea of getting worked up over Nickel Creek, pro or con, just seemed silly. I mean, I have a Nickel Creek song in my iTunes, and I couldn’t even tell you what it sounds like. They’re decent, but I suspect they’re the sort of songs you could forget as you’re playing them.

    Nickelback, on the other hand, I hadn’t a clue. I’ve since listened to a little of their music, and I’m not entirely surprised to see them described as the Canadian Creed. It just seems so aggressively mediocre.

    Canada’s produced a lot of great musicians. I promise not hold Nickelback against your entire nation.

Comments are closed.