{"id":3555,"date":"2009-08-30T21:31:32","date_gmt":"2009-08-31T01:31:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/?p=3555"},"modified":"2009-08-30T21:31:32","modified_gmt":"2009-08-31T01:31:32","slug":"recent-movie-roundup","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/?p=3555","title":{"rendered":"Recent movie roundup"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><font face=\"Verdana\" size=\"2\">Last night, I watched <a href=\"http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/title\/tt0465580\/\">Push<\/a>, which I wanted to enjoy more than I did. It&#8217;s a colorful look at Hong Kong, if nothing else, but the plot is such a terrible muddle. I think my opinion falls somewhere between <a href=\"http:\/\/rogerebert.suntimes.com\/apps\/pbcs.dll\/article?AID=\/20090204\/REVIEWS\/902059995\/1023\">Roger Ebert<\/a>, who wrote:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;Push&#8221; has vibrant cinematography and decent acting, but I&#8217;m blasted if I know what it&#8217;s about.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><font face=\"Verdana\" size=\"2\">And <a href=\"http:\/\/www.avclub.com\/articles\/push,23499\/\">Tasha Robinson<\/a>, who wrote:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The subject matter is propulsive adolescent fun all the way, with a pop sensibility, some nifty costume and set design, and a lot of special-effects-powered showdowns\u00e2\u20ac\u201dbut the execution reaches for a broader audience, one so unfamiliar with the genre tropes that it needs the assiduous extra explanation, plus time to ponder each new development. The resultant moderate pacing has its appeal; it turns <i>Push<\/i> into an ambling, broody concoction along the lines of <i>Strange Days<\/i>. At times, a more aggressive editor would help immensely. At others, <i>Push<\/i> explores its brutish future Hong Kong with a patience and sense of milieu that seems cribbed more from Wong Kar-wai than Doug Liman.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><font face=\"Verdana\" size=\"2\">Robinson is a lot more forgiving of the movie&#8217;s faults, which stem largely from its script (front-loaded with unnecessary exposition and never truly resolving anything), but also from a sometimes confused, or at least over-stylized, visual sense. The movie is often very pretty, but it&#8217;s not always clear what that aesthetic is in service of. The location shooting in Hong Kong is, at first, one of the movie&#8217;s biggest strengths &#8212; it&#8217;s a truly exotic and vibrant city, rarely seen like this from the ground-level up, and so it&#8217;s almost its own character in the film &#8212; but by the end it seemed increasingly less organic to the story, more style than substance. The climactic action at the stuff-that-looks-cool-when-it-explodes factory just serves to drive this home.<\/p>\n<p><font face=\"Verdana\" size=\"2\">And it&#8217;s a shame, because there&#8217;s a genuinely interesting story, with some decent world-building, lurking around the edges. It&#8217;s not a <i>good<\/i> movie, but I can&#8217;t shake the feeling that it could have been.<\/p>\n<p><font face=\"Verdana\" size=\"2\">Then this afternoon, I watched <a href=\"http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/title\/tt0452694\/\">The Time Traveler&#8217;s Wife<\/a> with a couple of friends. I thought it was a decent, if unremarkable adaptation of a book that, while entertaining, didn&#8217;t really cry out to be adapted. <\/p>\n<p><font face=\"Verdana\" size=\"2\">I liked that it addressed my main quibble with Audrey Niffenegger&#8217;s book &#8212; which I just finished reading a couple of weeks ago, actually &#8212; which was that its title was a bit of a misnomer. The book is less about the time traveler&#8217;s <i>wife<\/i>, Clare, than about the time traveler himself, Henry. While the book offers significantly more detail from both of their perspectives, I rarely felt like Clare emerged as a fully developed character in its pages, at least not outside of her undying love for Henry and their strange relationship. I <i>liked<\/i> both of them, but I felt that I got to know Henry better. Maybe it&#8217;s due to Rachel McAdams &#8212; I think she and Eric Bana are well cast, and I agree with <a href=\"http:\/\/rogerebert.suntimes.com\/apps\/pbcs.dll\/article?AID=\/20090812\/REVIEWS\/908129993\/1023\">Roger Ebert<\/a> that they &#8220;have a pleasant chemistry, and sort of involved me in spite of myself&#8221; &#8212; but this Clare seems like more of a <i>person<\/i> to me. <\/p>\n<p><font face=\"Verdana\" size=\"2\">Ultimately, I think I liked the book better, and I think it handled its underlying conceit more ably than the film. But the film is reasonably entertaining, and I&#8217;m not sorry I saw it. Maybe that&#8217;s damning it with faint praise, but it isn&#8217;t half bad.<\/p>\n<p><font face=\"Verdana\" size=\"2\">But I think we can all agree that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=BE22GGKbGgA\">this<\/a> is a pretty odd choice for a wedding song. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I think Broken Social Scene do an interesting cover of the song, but even if you don&#8217;t know <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Love_Will_Tear_Us_Apart\">its history<\/a> or anything about Joy Division and Ian Curtis&#8217; suicide, &#8220;Love Will Tear Us Apart&#8221; hardly seems like the sentiment for a first dance between husband and wife.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, it does kind of make me want to re-watch <a href=\"http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/title\/tt0274309\/\">24 Hour Party People<\/a>&#8230;<\/font><\/p>\n<p><center><a href=\"http:\/\/www.hipsoda.com\/jazz\/gallery\/cappers.php?who=UnReality\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/images\/joydivision.jpg\"><\/a><\/center><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Last night, I watched Push, which I wanted to enjoy more than I did. It&#8217;s a colorful look at Hong Kong, if nothing else, but the plot is such a terrible muddle. I think my opinion falls somewhere between Roger Ebert, who wrote: &#8220;Push&#8221; has vibrant cinematography and decent acting, but I&#8217;m blasted if I &#8230; <a class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/?p=3555\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[16,14],"class_list":["post-3555","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-books","tag-movies"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3555"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3555"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3555\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3555"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3555"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3555"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}