{"id":2985,"date":"2008-05-28T15:05:50","date_gmt":"2008-05-28T20:05:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/?p=2985"},"modified":"2008-05-28T15:05:50","modified_gmt":"2008-05-28T20:05:50","slug":"ive-seen-those-english-dramas-too","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/?p=2985","title":{"rendered":"I&#8217;ve seen those English dramas, too&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><font face=\"Verdana\" size=\"2\">You know what I&#8217;ve been seeing a <i>lot<\/i> of recently? Hyphenated compounds with -ly adverbs. (Yeah, I know, probably not your first guess.) As in, &#8220;a fully-developed plan&#8221; or &#8220;their formerly-intractable armies.&#8221; I&#8217;m right in thinking this is wrong&#8230;um, right? I don&#8217;t have a lot of grammatical pet peeves &#8212; spelling &#8220;ridiculous&#8221; with an -e is usually one of them; so is that old <i>Harry Potter<\/i> staple &#8220;He said darkly&#8221; &#8212; but this has actually been bugging me lately. <\/p>\n<p>I think it&#8217;s more because it&#8217;s briefly cast doubt on what I thought I knew about grammar, and less because it&#8217;s a particularly important or vital rule.  I am, in fact, having a tough time &#8212; and so would welcome any examples you might have in the comments below &#8212; of specific cases where the meaning of a phrase would be different (and thereby rendered confusing) with the hypen than without. I mean, that&#8217;s ultimately the purpose of grammar: not to force us all to speak and write the same way, but to alleviate the confusion that often arises when we don&#8217;t.<\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>You know what I&#8217;ve been seeing a lot of recently? Hyphenated compounds with -ly adverbs. (Yeah, I know, probably not your first guess.) As in, &#8220;a fully-developed plan&#8221; or &#8220;their formerly-intractable armies.&#8221; I&#8217;m right in thinking this is wrong&#8230;um, right? I don&#8217;t have a lot of grammatical pet peeves &#8212; spelling &#8220;ridiculous&#8221; with an -e &#8230; <a class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/?p=2985\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[238],"class_list":["post-2985","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2985"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2985"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2985\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2985"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2985"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2985"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}