{"id":244,"date":"2002-04-08T07:19:00","date_gmt":"2002-04-08T15:19:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/?p=244"},"modified":"2002-04-08T07:19:00","modified_gmt":"2002-04-08T15:19:00","slug":"244","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/?p=244","title":{"rendered":""},"content":{"rendered":"<p><font face=\"Verdana\" size=\"2\">The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.acutecut.com\/p2p.html\">Peer-to-Peer Review Project<\/a> seemed like a good idea at the time. The objective was &#8220;to let bloggers review other bloggers in a huge ring [and] introduce more bloggers to each other&#8217;s sites&#8230;&#8221; It sounded interesting enough, and far be it from me to pass up the chance to whore my weblog around, so I signed up.<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font face=\"Verdana\" size=\"2\">Then, months later, when I had all but forgotten about the project, an e-mail arrived with the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tombiro.com\/notreallynews.html\">link<\/a> I was supposed to review. I followed the link, poked around the site a little, and realized that I had almost nothing constructive to say. I wasn&#8217;t impressed or upset, and it wasn&#8217;t brilliant or awful. In fact, it wasn&#8217;t much of anything. There just wasn&#8217;t anything to write.<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font face=\"Verdana\" size=\"2\">So I ignored it, until this morning when I checked my e-mail again and realized that the deadline I had <em>thought<\/em> was at least a week away &#8212; plenty of time &#8212; was, in fact, <em>today<\/em>. So I went back to the site, and I poked around a little, and eventually this is what I wrote:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>My overall impression &#8212; and I wish it was not so; I wish I had more to say &#8212; is that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tombiro.com\/notreallynews.html\">newsance<\/a>, aside from the amusing pun of its title and its straightforward, if relatively unexciting design, doesn&#8217;t have much to offer. The fact that there are only nine days of short entries, ending more than a full month ago, doesn&#8217;t help matters any. Authors Tom Biro and Misha Glezin bill the site (all eight entries of it) as &#8220;a collection of satire-ish articles manufactured by some of the most fantastic brains of our time for your reading amusement.&#8221; Obviously, that&#8217;s meant to be somewhat tongue-in-cheek, but, in all honesty, I wasn&#8217;t terribly amused by any of it. This short and seemingly discarded weblog reads like a halfhearted attempt at what <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theonion.com\">the Onion<\/a> and others do much better on a regular basis. And while perhaps it isn&#8217;t fair to hold newsance up to the standard of a professional publication like the Onion, it offers no special features and nothing to recommend repeat visits.  A chuckle maybe, here and there, but not much else.  I realize that, as a part of the peer-to-peer review project, we are encouraged \u00e2\u20ac\u0153to go into detail with a few things\u00e2\u20ac\u009d, but how much detail can there be in just over a week\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s worth of entries? If its own authors lost interest less than two weeks into the endeavor, why should the average reader bother to even care?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>And then, of course, after all of that was done and I&#8217;d fulfilled my end of the peer-to-peer responsibilities, I wandered over to Tom Biro&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tombiro.com\/blog.html\">personal weblog<\/a>, where, wouldn&#8217;t ya know it, he writes: &#8220;i was thinking of going away from the silly newsance thing i had posted here for a while, and still haven&#8217;t deleted&#8230; i don&#8217;t obviously think i&#8217;m matt drudge or anything, but think it would be neat just to have a page with interesting news articles, rather than me posting them all over the place in my blog&#8230;.&#8221;<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font face=\"Verdana\" size=\"2\">I wish he had told someone that earlier. It might have been nice to review an active weblog.<\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Peer-to-Peer Review Project seemed like a good idea at the time. The objective was &#8220;to let bloggers review other bloggers in a huge ring [and] introduce more bloggers to each other&#8217;s sites&#8230;&#8221; It sounded interesting enough, and far be it from me to pass up the chance to whore my weblog around, so I &#8230; <a class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/?p=244\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[238],"class_list":["post-244","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=244"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=244"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=244"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unreality.net\/weblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=244"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}